02-06-2025, 06:49 AM
Everyone is probably still trying to integrate all the news from the past week or two into their brain, but the immediate shock is probably over for people with well curated news feeds. A lot of people knew already too, even if they didn't know the scale or have receipts. There's still some way to go yet for those on the USAID moderated Internet space and the few remaining souls that believe the mainstream press. They haven't even started to get shocked yet, but it's going to get really hard to hide it from them soon enough. By the time it's over everyone will probably have witnessed at least one highly public narcissistic personality collapse. That started really hitting hard in 2016 and is probably going to peak in the next 6 months or so, I'd guess.
The DOGE team hitting the ground running and dropping bombs on USAID wasn't something I really expected, so I see some interesting doors to go through with this information in the sunlight.
As the USAID money laundering got its cover thrown off, in an atmosphere where more than one prominent voice has called for abolishing the federal income tax, I've seen very little movement toward an organized tax revolt as of yet. It's still early for those just waking up to the corruption, but the longer it goes on the more objectionable or downright repugnant uses of taxpayers funds will become evident. I think real discussion of a tax revolt has been taboo even on the fringes. I haven't done any real research on how things turn out in general for people that try to lead tax reform movements or revolts in a public way, but I think everyone can recall the history of IRS controversies and then can throw in a bunch of other actions by agencies they know often do the bidding of the blob. The higher up the food chain, the more you have to lose, and the more they're willing to leverage against you. There's no shortage of cases, but you probably already knew that if you're reading this site.
The reveal on USAID is just at the surface right now. This was just stopping the flow. There is already clear evidence of US tax dollars directly funding organizations that have created pandemic-capable pathogens, have worked to violate the basic rights of citizens all over the globe (including the US), and many in the DC orbit (or their family, or friends, or organizations) seem to be beneficiaries of that money in fairly direct ways. There has never been a time in my memory when such clear evidence of the total subversion of government has been available to the masses. There will be more, but what is already exposed is enough to understand that something stinks in Denmark.
People in DC will talk about abolishing the federal income tax, but they've talked about a lot of things for a lot of years. The Libertarian party was taken over by WEF fetishists for 2024, for some reason, with 30 trillion or so in debt and rampant corruption at all levels of government... but the Libertarian nominee seemed more interested in how many penises society can get into girl's locker areas than the black heart of corruption entrenched in DC. These just aren't serious people and not trustworthy people. Many such cases, as we witnessed with the RINO candidates for Republican offices increasingly swarming out from the urban centers like locusts over the past decade. D or R, whatever, is just a mask. Whatever face they wear, these are the people eager to exercise power like authoritarians for their activist causes and get in on the NGO gravy trains. Most of what is relevant to us now goes back to 2014, but this isn't new by any stretch. I'm aware of it happening on the ground in the 80's, though I was too young to care and had no Internet to follow bread crumbs on. Again, I saw it on the ground in 2009, but only really understood the scope with the context of 2019 onward. Just domestically, not to even touch on the many foreign misadventures.
It's hard to tell when it began. but the deeper you dig the easier it is to believe it goes back to at least WWII. Today we have what is the height of civilizational corruption and, unless you want to get into esoterica, there is nothing approaching this scale in our history books. A bunch of painted faces cavorting about like they're better than everyone else is nothing new. Them paying people to say nice things about them with your money is nothing new. Funding people to harass or destroy you if you say the wrong thing is nothing new. The scale and scope are new. They drop bombs, they fund terrorists, they engorge themselves like leeches as millions are maimed and murdered. And that's just the USA... which isn't even half the story. At what point are we morally justified, perhaps even obligated, to stop contributing?
So will anyone emerge to suggest that Americans should not be subject to what amounts to taxation without representation, that being forced to fund morally reprehensible things is incompatible with our founding documents, and to assert citizens are within their rights to cease giving in to this criminal enterprise? There is no reasonable oversight and clearly hasn't been for some time. Wages have not kept up with inflation and the most wealthy people continue to gain a greater share of the pie. The most vulnerable continue to be pawns for the elite. Insider trading is in the open. People in DC (and the IRS) owe millions in back taxes. Connected families and their friends get pardoned in the event anyone even investigates their in-your-face corruption. Why are we still paying to use all the infrastructure our taxes paid to build over the past 80 years while it crumbles around us? Why are natural disaster victims not getting the help they need when this is one of the few federal expenditures that nearly all citizens agree is necessary? There are so many questions that nobody taking your money will answer.
This criminal enterprise has killed many millions of people all over the globe. Generations of suffering, whole regions locked in misery, all in service to the continued hoarding of obscene amounts of wealth. It has allowed problems to fester (or incited them) in order to continue stealing this money, first from the taxpayers and then from the people that were supposed to be getting the aid. It takes very evil people to hide behind these fronts while facilitating corporate exploitation of the planet and all its inhabitants. All of these fake philanthropic organization founders/CEOs raking in government money and every person in government that has turned a blind eye while taxpayer funds built their personal empires needs to be prosecuted. You can look at the names coming up on the Republican side and it will be no surprise what names you find. These subversive criminals are going to try to explain it all away while Americans are filling out tax forms and praying they don't get flagged for extra extortion by some algorithm. Slava Ukraini, on the lips of every Republican kneeling at the NGO glory hole. That's anti-Semitic, ready to be hurled whenever you question a neocon whore about thousands of children in Gaza that were murdered in their homes on our dime.
So will anyone emerge to hold their feet to the fire or call their bluffs on ending federal income tax? Do citizens have a right to stop supporting the exploitation of citizens of countries all over the world (and at home) through the use of contrived news and sponsored protests (and much worse)? At what point does the open fraud, aided by these unethical social engineering (and medical) experiments, constitute a big enough threat to our future security that we must never again allow the government to steal the fruit of individual labor for any purpose? If decades of abuse doesn't result in people going to prison, what difference will a promise not to use your taxes like this again really make? Promises mean nothing without accountability. If the legislative body is above the law then I don't think they're legitimate representation. They're not our peers and can't really represent us, can they? Do we have standing to challenge anything and, if not, why are we funding it at all?
Trump is going to have some limits to his political power plays and I'm highly skeptical on the federal income tax really being on the table. I can't imagine a time that the citizens will have a better position of leverage with a populist movement in the WH and with establishment figures, in highly compromising positions, all on their heels. I have no idea what the operational capacity of the IRS is or what amount of delinquency would create logistical problems, but I have no doubt people have studied it (and probably don't share it much). In some dusty government basement somewhere, from back when they didn't think they owned us outright, there's a classified paper wargaming this exact scenario.
Nothing is gaining steam just yet and there is no coherent voice forming. I don't know that it'll be an organic movement if it takes off, but I at least know USAID won't be funding it for the time being. This is all just conjecture and observation, so feel free to offer your own. Consider this a soft topic with a broader umbrella of what new possibilities are emergent from the current event stream. Six months ago I'd have said tax revolt would be fruitless and/or impossible to pull off, but I never saw USAID getting dragging out into the sunlight like it has.
The DOGE team hitting the ground running and dropping bombs on USAID wasn't something I really expected, so I see some interesting doors to go through with this information in the sunlight.
As the USAID money laundering got its cover thrown off, in an atmosphere where more than one prominent voice has called for abolishing the federal income tax, I've seen very little movement toward an organized tax revolt as of yet. It's still early for those just waking up to the corruption, but the longer it goes on the more objectionable or downright repugnant uses of taxpayers funds will become evident. I think real discussion of a tax revolt has been taboo even on the fringes. I haven't done any real research on how things turn out in general for people that try to lead tax reform movements or revolts in a public way, but I think everyone can recall the history of IRS controversies and then can throw in a bunch of other actions by agencies they know often do the bidding of the blob. The higher up the food chain, the more you have to lose, and the more they're willing to leverage against you. There's no shortage of cases, but you probably already knew that if you're reading this site.
The reveal on USAID is just at the surface right now. This was just stopping the flow. There is already clear evidence of US tax dollars directly funding organizations that have created pandemic-capable pathogens, have worked to violate the basic rights of citizens all over the globe (including the US), and many in the DC orbit (or their family, or friends, or organizations) seem to be beneficiaries of that money in fairly direct ways. There has never been a time in my memory when such clear evidence of the total subversion of government has been available to the masses. There will be more, but what is already exposed is enough to understand that something stinks in Denmark.
People in DC will talk about abolishing the federal income tax, but they've talked about a lot of things for a lot of years. The Libertarian party was taken over by WEF fetishists for 2024, for some reason, with 30 trillion or so in debt and rampant corruption at all levels of government... but the Libertarian nominee seemed more interested in how many penises society can get into girl's locker areas than the black heart of corruption entrenched in DC. These just aren't serious people and not trustworthy people. Many such cases, as we witnessed with the RINO candidates for Republican offices increasingly swarming out from the urban centers like locusts over the past decade. D or R, whatever, is just a mask. Whatever face they wear, these are the people eager to exercise power like authoritarians for their activist causes and get in on the NGO gravy trains. Most of what is relevant to us now goes back to 2014, but this isn't new by any stretch. I'm aware of it happening on the ground in the 80's, though I was too young to care and had no Internet to follow bread crumbs on. Again, I saw it on the ground in 2009, but only really understood the scope with the context of 2019 onward. Just domestically, not to even touch on the many foreign misadventures.
It's hard to tell when it began. but the deeper you dig the easier it is to believe it goes back to at least WWII. Today we have what is the height of civilizational corruption and, unless you want to get into esoterica, there is nothing approaching this scale in our history books. A bunch of painted faces cavorting about like they're better than everyone else is nothing new. Them paying people to say nice things about them with your money is nothing new. Funding people to harass or destroy you if you say the wrong thing is nothing new. The scale and scope are new. They drop bombs, they fund terrorists, they engorge themselves like leeches as millions are maimed and murdered. And that's just the USA... which isn't even half the story. At what point are we morally justified, perhaps even obligated, to stop contributing?
So will anyone emerge to suggest that Americans should not be subject to what amounts to taxation without representation, that being forced to fund morally reprehensible things is incompatible with our founding documents, and to assert citizens are within their rights to cease giving in to this criminal enterprise? There is no reasonable oversight and clearly hasn't been for some time. Wages have not kept up with inflation and the most wealthy people continue to gain a greater share of the pie. The most vulnerable continue to be pawns for the elite. Insider trading is in the open. People in DC (and the IRS) owe millions in back taxes. Connected families and their friends get pardoned in the event anyone even investigates their in-your-face corruption. Why are we still paying to use all the infrastructure our taxes paid to build over the past 80 years while it crumbles around us? Why are natural disaster victims not getting the help they need when this is one of the few federal expenditures that nearly all citizens agree is necessary? There are so many questions that nobody taking your money will answer.
This criminal enterprise has killed many millions of people all over the globe. Generations of suffering, whole regions locked in misery, all in service to the continued hoarding of obscene amounts of wealth. It has allowed problems to fester (or incited them) in order to continue stealing this money, first from the taxpayers and then from the people that were supposed to be getting the aid. It takes very evil people to hide behind these fronts while facilitating corporate exploitation of the planet and all its inhabitants. All of these fake philanthropic organization founders/CEOs raking in government money and every person in government that has turned a blind eye while taxpayer funds built their personal empires needs to be prosecuted. You can look at the names coming up on the Republican side and it will be no surprise what names you find. These subversive criminals are going to try to explain it all away while Americans are filling out tax forms and praying they don't get flagged for extra extortion by some algorithm. Slava Ukraini, on the lips of every Republican kneeling at the NGO glory hole. That's anti-Semitic, ready to be hurled whenever you question a neocon whore about thousands of children in Gaza that were murdered in their homes on our dime.
So will anyone emerge to hold their feet to the fire or call their bluffs on ending federal income tax? Do citizens have a right to stop supporting the exploitation of citizens of countries all over the world (and at home) through the use of contrived news and sponsored protests (and much worse)? At what point does the open fraud, aided by these unethical social engineering (and medical) experiments, constitute a big enough threat to our future security that we must never again allow the government to steal the fruit of individual labor for any purpose? If decades of abuse doesn't result in people going to prison, what difference will a promise not to use your taxes like this again really make? Promises mean nothing without accountability. If the legislative body is above the law then I don't think they're legitimate representation. They're not our peers and can't really represent us, can they? Do we have standing to challenge anything and, if not, why are we funding it at all?
Trump is going to have some limits to his political power plays and I'm highly skeptical on the federal income tax really being on the table. I can't imagine a time that the citizens will have a better position of leverage with a populist movement in the WH and with establishment figures, in highly compromising positions, all on their heels. I have no idea what the operational capacity of the IRS is or what amount of delinquency would create logistical problems, but I have no doubt people have studied it (and probably don't share it much). In some dusty government basement somewhere, from back when they didn't think they owned us outright, there's a classified paper wargaming this exact scenario.
Nothing is gaining steam just yet and there is no coherent voice forming. I don't know that it'll be an organic movement if it takes off, but I at least know USAID won't be funding it for the time being. This is all just conjecture and observation, so feel free to offer your own. Consider this a soft topic with a broader umbrella of what new possibilities are emergent from the current event stream. Six months ago I'd have said tax revolt would be fruitless and/or impossible to pull off, but I never saw USAID getting dragging out into the sunlight like it has.
