Not a member? Sign up:
Create an account  

UFO\Alien disclosure from way out of the left field

#1
*Edit * Seems the thread is a bit of a jumble, sorry about that. I'm leaving it the way it is for the conversations to make sense.

Antarctica UFO - Link to X. 

I'm going to post pics of the alleged conversation between a whistleblower and someone else.

There are of course reasons to be sceptical (always), but it's what was said about the 2 different alien species that got my brain ticking. 

Given how I view our history, can you guess at what I'm seeing?

I'll be posting the conversations pics I think only 4 is allowed per post or something. 

Enjoy!


   

   

   

   


More to Follow.
Reply

#2
   

   

   

   


More to follow.
Reply

#3
I think you may be misinterpreting the meaning of "two of them".

I don't think the statement was intending to suggest two different alien species, but rather two different groups of whistleblowers (one which sounds like government and perhaps another non-governmental group).

At least that's my take on what was written, just looking at the actual grammar of the response in the context of the question asked.

edit - The thing which jumps out at me and makes me think hoax is the statement..."Antarctica is no man's land..." That is an incorrect statement, and anyone who had truly been there in any research capacity would know this. Perhaps it was just a poorly worded reply. There are areas in Antarctica which do not have a national territorial claim, but they are relatively small in comparison to the vast majority of areas of Antarctica which absolutely do have territorial claims.
Reply

#4
   

   

   

   


More to follow.
Reply

#5
   

   

   



And that's all she wrote. 


Whaddaya think?
Reply

#6
(01-24-2025, 02:34 AM)FCD Wrote: I think you may be misinterpreting the meaning of "two of them".

Check out the last picture just before your post. 

*edit* sorry, after your post

Beer


I think what is meant by 'no-man's land' is that it's a very hostile environment to operate in and that they assembled a mix/match team from professionals that were available the quickest.
Reply

#7
(01-24-2025, 03:21 AM)19Bones79 Wrote: Check out the last picture just before your post. 

*edit* sorry, after your post

Beer


I think what is meant by 'no-man's land' is that it's a very hostile environment to operate in and that they assembled a mix/match team from professionals that were available the quickest.

Yeah, I actually posted that before one of your subsequent posts.  Sorry about that.

Whole thing seems pretty crazy.
Reply

#8
I agree, very crazy. 

I'll be watching it closely to encourage or deny some ideas that are mauling around in my head.


There's too many unanswered questions that remain.
Reply

#9
(01-24-2025, 03:33 AM)19Bones79 Wrote: I agree, very crazy. 

I'll be watching it closely to encourage or deny some ideas that are mauling around in my head.


There's too many unanswered questions that remain.

I'm going with LARP.

Not because I have any trouble believing these things are possible, but because of some of the additional information and pictures with it.

This sounds like some of the Law of One type stuff, Galactic Federation and Ra materials. Another group sort of into that are the guys Clif High was often crapping on from the Farsight Institute, the ones that were having board meetings with invisible entities on their YouTube.

More pictures came out, who knows if really from the same OP, that looked quite questionable too.

4chan has a rare good post, but it's LARP central.
Reply

#10
(01-24-2025, 06:31 AM)Ksihkehe Wrote: I'm going with LARP.

4chan has a rare good post, but it's LARP central.

True. 

It's not really new info just repackaged but the weird thing is how it spoke to my ideas on things, ideas which are both unpopular in the conspiracy theory clicks and sometimes..... banned. 

Still, it's only a feeling at this point. This guy will either trip himself up along the way, vanish, or post new info that somehow lines up for me. 

And where I'm possibly going with this is not something you ever see promoted on other sites... 

Need more info though, this is drip feeding bullshit and that does not make sense considering "what's at stake for this guy". 

Same as the other whistleblowers which he says to not trust. 

They're all taking "a great risk to their lives" to farm engagement and introduce concepts into the public mind.
Reply