Something to Ponder

[19Bones79]

"They haven't got the numbers to pull it off unless they use weapons of mass destruction. "
All they need is fear to pass laws people will later come to regret. 911 gave us surveilance on steroids by weaponized enforcemnt agencies.; even Tulsi is on a terrorist watch list!

"The bad guys are in charge regardless of who becomes president. "
The /bad guys' want world denomination; agenda 2030. 

"I reckon these drones, among other things might be a pressure release for the public as the country's wealth is being blead dry."

It seems like a distraction to me. What laws is Schumer concoctiong to save us from this terrible threat? What rights will we have to give up to feel 'safe'?

Now the news is reporting readiative material went missing on Dec. 3, but thery're not telling people it's virtually harmless. Ramping up the fear.

There's still 30 tons of amonium nitrate missing after 'leaking' from a rail car in 2022.

There are those who believe 9/11 was at the hands of Osama bin Laden and those who don't. Those who don't wouldn't put it past the government to do it again, maybe on an even grander scale to get the majority onboard with giving up ther freedoms in exchange for being safe. 
I think it would take an event much larger than 9/11 to pull it off with the aid of other world governments. 

I kind of entertain the idea that Trump is either in on and part of the grand plan or they will stop him any way they can.

So much evil has happened since 2019 relesed Covid on the world and Biden took office that I'm just not ready to trust nyone in charge of our country yet. I see subterfuge around every corner.

I am not emotionally invested in any of it; I observe what's going on like I'm watching a movie and trying to guess the ending after the first ten minutes of viewing. I'm pretty good at it when I'm watching the big screen; lets just hope I suck at second guessing real life events. 

Yeah, me too. I would love to be wrong. 


Perhaps if everyone who voted for Trump come together whether in real life and/or online and started a top 10 list poll of what Trump should fix first it will become show and tell. 

Can Trump supporters reach him to further their own interests?

Do they even want to?

Isn't there supposed to be some sort of two-way interaction?

Trump would easily have to show his hand in all matters concerned. 

[19Bones79]

Apparently they're now pushing federal legislation and, I have no doubt, funding.

Schumer is calling for Mayorkas to do something.

That's all I needed to know.

Whatever doubts I had that this is a scam have sublimated into the aether. There can be no doubt that it's a scam  Mayorkas is the clown that said they have no money for disaster relief for the last hurricane yet has been dumping hundreds of millions into moving illegals into the country.

Now we have a real show. Hochul and Schumer are leading the "official" outrage. Schumer has been a parasite of government for five decades. Hochul was all in on COViD tyranny and took over after it become clear that Cuomo was going down.

Now they're playing on the misplaced hope of UFO enthusiasts that this advances their disclosure agenda -coupled with the ignorance of the general public- to let hysteria run wild.

If they're all in on it, they might be giving Trump an easy target to knock down in order from preventing a type of grassroots movement I mentioned to Nugs. 

I really don't know what to think anymore. 

Every potential smokescreen can be flipped into something tangible. 

They have so many options, it's like a tree branching out.

Let's see what happens. 

[Nugget]

Yeah, me too. I would love to be wrong. 


Perhaps if everyone who voted for Trump come together whether in real life and/or online and started a top 10 list poll of what Trump should fix first it will become show and tell. 

Can Trump supporters reach him to further their own interests?

Do they even want to?

Isn't there supposed to be some sort of two-way interaction?

Trump would easily have to show his hand in all matters concerned. 

There are too many chief's running America and the only way people seem to have of reaching the top is to organize a mass protest or riot. Even then, they only accomplish what the PTB want to allow them too.

People want real change, but the problem seems to be they all have a diifernt opinion of what needs to change and priority. Without some sort of cohesion it's futile. Everybody wants change bur few have the time to invest and the knowledge or will to make it happen. 

Our two-way interaction is to lobby our state representatives and/or contact our senators. That works if it plays well with the politicians public image, such as remaning a street or getting a law passed Such as Amber Alerts, but it takes years to accomplish.
Sadly, we're an on-demand generation, and if it doesn't happen quickly or takes too much time and effort people are likely to lose interest before reaching the goal line.

Trump's qualifications as a business man and tough negotiater were established during his first term, but so was his naivety in trusting the wrong people and being able to see what the political ramifications might be 25, 50, 75 years down the road.

He's got a lot of untested people on his team this time around. Some seem to be all about ladder-climbing while others seem uber-patriotic. I worry that implimenting too many changes too rapidly can put the country in a tailspin.

The biggest problem for him is going to be reducing government bloat and insider corruption. That's going to be an uphill battle, or more likely an internal war. I suspect watching it all play out will be an out-of-body experience for me.

[19Bones79]

There are too many chief's running America and the only way people seem to have of reaching the top is to organize a mass protest or riot. Even then, they only accomplish what the PTB want to allow them too.

People want real change, but the problem seems to be they all have a diifernt opinion of what needs to change and priority. Without some sort of cohesion it's futile. Everybody wants change bur few have the time to invest and the knowledge or will to make it happen. 

Our two-way interaction is to lobby our state representatives and/or contact our senators. That works if it plays well with the politicians public image, such as remaning a street or getting a law passed Such as Amber Alerts, but it takes years to accomplish.
Sadly, we're an on-demand generation, and if it doesn't happen quickly or takes too much time and effort people are likely to lose interest before reaching the goal line.

Trump's qualifications as a business man and tough negotiater were established during his first term, but so was his naivety in trusting the wrong people and being able to see what the political ramifications might be 25, 50, 75 years down the road.

He's got a lot of untested people on his team this time around. Some seem to be all about ladder-climbing while others seem uber-patriotic. I worry that implimenting too many changes too rapidly can put the country in a tailspin.

The biggest problem for him is going to be reducing government bloat and insider corruption. That's going to be an uphill battle, or more likely an internal war. I suspect watching it all play out will be an out-of-body experience for me.

I'm sorry Nugs, you deserve a better world than this.

Trump's thing is he does business amongst politicians.