05-31-2025, 11:56 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 09:35 PM by NobodySpecial268.
Edit Reason: typo
)
In writing these posts on an extensive subject generally comes down more to what I don't write than what I do write. I could waffle on for hours . . . , and it is up to the reader to ask for clarification, which I can do.
In the paragraph:
I should add that when I say "the Hindu" what I actually mean is the Hindu dreamscape. The same when I refer to Anthroposophy as in the dreamscape of Anthroposophy. One can also say the Catholic dreamscape for that matter. They all work on the same principal; shared interactive dreamscapes. One could use the word world instead of dreamscape as a synonym in the context of this thread. "The spiritual worlds" for example, implies more than one spiritual world. That is what they are, worlds separate from each other. Ideologies too.
The catch, the trap one might say, is the Catholics said that their religion includes everything. That implies that there is nothing outside Catholicism because "god" made everything. If we take the Catholic word for it, well, we can't go or see outside. The new age has it's "universe", a similar thing. That is how these things work.
Grok?
So when I used Agnihotra and Biodynamics in my garden what actually occured was I included nodes to other dreamscapes, which the Nature Beings didn't appreciate. That is why I stopped the practices. One can look at these things in terms of computer networking; network nodes were created linking other dreamscapes to my garden's shared interactive dreamscape.
The greys tried this out on me one time with the opening words: "All is one." - my response was a sarcastic ; "yeah right . . ." We got on on fairly equal terms after that.
In the paragraph:
Quote:I said the practice was temporary in my garden, well that is because the practice originates in the Hindu, and subsequently my garden got a lot of attention from other-worldly Hindu people who would visit here. That upset my garden's little Nature spirits, and so the practice was stopped. A similar thing with Biodynamic agriculture methods I employed here. That brings Anthroposophists in its wake.
I should add that when I say "the Hindu" what I actually mean is the Hindu dreamscape. The same when I refer to Anthroposophy as in the dreamscape of Anthroposophy. One can also say the Catholic dreamscape for that matter. They all work on the same principal; shared interactive dreamscapes. One could use the word world instead of dreamscape as a synonym in the context of this thread. "The spiritual worlds" for example, implies more than one spiritual world. That is what they are, worlds separate from each other. Ideologies too.
The catch, the trap one might say, is the Catholics said that their religion includes everything. That implies that there is nothing outside Catholicism because "god" made everything. If we take the Catholic word for it, well, we can't go or see outside. The new age has it's "universe", a similar thing. That is how these things work.
Grok?
So when I used Agnihotra and Biodynamics in my garden what actually occured was I included nodes to other dreamscapes, which the Nature Beings didn't appreciate. That is why I stopped the practices. One can look at these things in terms of computer networking; network nodes were created linking other dreamscapes to my garden's shared interactive dreamscape.
The greys tried this out on me one time with the opening words: "All is one." - my response was a sarcastic ; "yeah right . . ." We got on on fairly equal terms after that.