02-28-2025, 04:31 AM
We're entering the era of 'transparency' now.
I'm so excited.
I've thought long and hard about it, and it stinks to high heaven.
It's impossible to beat the Cabal with force, and it creates monsters out of decent men,reinforcing yet another cycle of manipulation, deception and outright lies. That's the promise violence holds.
Therefore , violence can NEVER be the option.
Exposing the official narrative going back, from before any of us were born, remains the only viable strategy.
There are people throughout history that sounded the alarm, their legacies forever muddied by TPTB who tell you what to think and how to frame it.
They also silence people with legal threats, those who dare to be sceptic about certain historical events.
You can pretty much say what you want about white people, black people, Chinese amongst other asian nations, you can make jokes about the Vietnamese and deny the slaughter that took place by American soldiers. Hell, you can openly hate all Arabs and judge them as in "more than a billion Muslims against a tiny nation, women and children in Gaza are also terrorists and deserved to be wiped out...
... then there's this one anomaly.
Picture a people that have been kicked out of most countries they inserted themselves in.
Picture a world where to criticize them is the one no-no politicians that are polar opposites of each other find a common cause.
As per Grok, who I had to asked numerous times to compile a complete list of countries where legal action could be taken against you for questioning the holocaust narrative(it started out as 19):
I’ve been tasked with updating the list of all countries with laws capable of punishing vocal Holocaust denial, with a specific focus on identifying additional countries in Asia and Africa, as of February 28, 2025. This requires a thorough search beyond my previous list of 42 countries, examining legal frameworks in these regions where such laws are less common due to historical, cultural, and legal differences. I’ll assess explicit Holocaust denial laws, as well as broader statutes (e.g., genocide denial, hate speech) that could reasonably apply, ensuring the list is comprehensive and grounded in current data.
Search for Asia and Africa
Asia: Most Asian countries lack specific Holocaust denial laws due to limited direct historical connection to the Holocaust and stronger emphasis on free speech or other regional priorities. However, some have hate speech or genocide denial laws influenced by international norms or local Jewish communities.
Africa: Similarly, Africa has few explicit laws, as the Holocaust wasn’t a local event, and legal systems often prioritize postcolonial or ethnic conflict issues. Broad anti-racism or hate speech laws may apply in some cases, especially in countries with international alignment or Jewish populations.
Asia Findings
India - The Information Technology Act, 2000 (amended 2008), Section 69A, allows blocking content that incites hatred or threatens public order. Holocaust denial could be restricted if it targets Jewish communities online, with penalties under Section 295A of the Penal Code (up to 3 years) for outraging religious feelings. No explicit Holocaust law, but applicable in context.
Japan - The Act on Punishment of Involvement in Hate Speech (2016) bans hate speech against ethnic groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could be prosecuted if it incites discrimination (fines or injunctions), though no specific cases exist.
South Korea - The National Conference for Unification Act and Criminal Code Article 310 allow punishment of hate speech or historical distortions if they harm public peace. Holocaust denial targeting Jews could qualify (up to 7 years), influenced by South Korea’s Holocaust education efforts.
Africa Findings
Rwanda - Law No. 84/2013 on Genocide Ideology and Related Crimes bans denial of any genocide, including the Holocaust, to prevent revisionism post-1994 genocide (up to 10 years). Explicitly covers Holocaust denial due to international legal alignment.
Kenya - The National Cohesion and Integration Act (2008), Section 13, bans hate speech promoting discrimination or hostility against ethnic or religious groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could be prosecuted if it incites hatred (up to 5 years or fines).
Namibia - The Racial Discrimination Prohibition Act (1991) bans incitement to racial hatred. As a former German colony aware of Nazi history, Holocaust denial could be actionable if it targets Jews (up to 5 years).
Other Regions (Missed Previously)
Estonia - Penal Code Article 151 bans public incitement to hatred or denial of genocide, including the Holocaust (up to 3 years). EU influence and Nazi occupation history make it applicable.
Ireland - Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act (1989) bans speech inciting hatred against religious or ethnic groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could qualify (up to 2 years), despite Ireland’s free speech leanings.
Updated Comprehensive List
Here’s the full list, now 50 countries, integrating the 42 prior entries with 6 new ones from Asia and Africa, plus 2 from Europe:
Argentina - Law 23.592 (1988), amended 2002: Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial targeting Jews (up to 3 years).
Australia - Section 18C, Racial Discrimination Act 1975: Punishes Holocaust denial as racial vilification (civil penalties, jail for contempt).
Austria - Section 3g, Prohibition Act: Explicitly bans Holocaust denial (up to 10 years).
Belgium - 1995 Holocaust Denial Law: Bans public denial (up to 1 year).
Bolivia - Law No. 045 (2010), Article 16: Bans racism incitement, including Holocaust denial if it targets Jews (up to 5 years).
Bosnia and Herzegovina - Article 145a, Criminal Code (2021): Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (6 months to 5 years).
Brazil - Law 7.716 (1989), amended 2019: Bans racism, including Holocaust denial tied to Nazi ideology (up to 5 years).
Bulgaria - Article 419a, Criminal Code: Bans denial of crimes against humanity, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Canada - Section 319, Criminal Code (2022): Bans antisemitic hate, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Chile - Law 20.609 (2012), Article 31: Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial if antisemitic (up to 3 years).
Colombia - Law 1482 (2011), Article 134A: Bans genocide denial inciting discrimination, including Holocaust (up to 36 months).
Croatia - Article 325, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 3 years).
Cyprus - Law 134(I)/2011: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 5 years).
Czech Republic - Section 261, Criminal Code: Bans Nazi genocide denial, including Holocaust (6 months to 3 years).
Estonia - Penal Code Article 151: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Finland - Chapter 11, Section 10, Criminal Code: Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial targeting Jews (up to 2 years).
France - Gayssot Act (1990): Bans denial of Nuremberg crimes, including Holocaust (up to 1 year or fines).
Germany - Section 130(3), Penal Code: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Greece - Law 927/1979 (2014): Bans Holocaust denial if it incites hatred (up to 3 years).
Hungary - Article 269/C, Criminal Code: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
India - Section 295A, Penal Code & IT Act Section 69A: Bans religious outrage or hate incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Ireland - Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act (1989): Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Israel - Denial of Holocaust (Prohibition) Law (1986): Bans public denial (up to 5 years).
Italy - Law 205/1993 (2016): Bans Holocaust denial (up to 6 years).
Japan - Hate Speech Act (2016): Bans ethnic hate, including Holocaust denial if it incites discrimination (fines or injunctions).
Kenya - National Cohesion Act (2008), Section 13: Bans hate speech, including Holocaust denial if it incites hatred (up to 5 years).
Latvia - Section 74.1, Criminal Law: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Liechtenstein - Article 283, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 2 years).
Lithuania - Article 170(2), Criminal Code: Bans denial of international crimes, including Holocaust (up to 2 years).
Luxembourg - Article 457-3, Penal Code: Bans Holocaust denial (8 days to 6 months or fines).
Malta - Article 82A, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it promotes hatred (up to 18 months).
Namibia - Racial Discrimination Prohibition Act (1991): Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 5 years).
Netherlands - Articles 137c/d, Penal Code: Bans Holocaust denial as defamation or incitement (up to 2 years).
New Zealand - Human Rights Act 1993, Section 61: Bans racial hatred, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years or fines).
Poland - Article 55, Institute of National Remembrance Act: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Portugal - Article 240, Penal Code: Bans denial of crimes against humanity, including Holocaust (up to 4 years).
Romania - Ordinance No. 31/2002 (2015): Bans public Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Russia - Article 354.1, Criminal Code (2014): Bans Nuremberg fact denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Rwanda - Law No. 84/2013: Bans all genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 10 years).
Slovakia - Section 422d, Criminal Code: Bans Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Slovenia - Article 297, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 2 years).
South Africa - Equality Act (2000), Section 10: Bans hate speech, including Holocaust denial (civil penalties, jail for contempt).
South Korea - Criminal Code Article 310: Bans hate speech disrupting peace, including Holocaust denial (up to 7 years).
Spain - Article 510, Penal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 4 years).
Sweden - Chapter 16, Section 8, Penal Code: Bans contempt for groups, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Switzerland - Article 261bis, Penal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Ukraine - Article 161, Criminal Code (2021): Bans Holocaust denial as antisemitism (up to 5 years).
United Kingdom - Public Order Act 1986 (Sections 18-23): Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 7 years).
United States - State laws (e.g., NJ N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4) punish Holocaust denial if it incites violence (up to 18 months).
Uruguay - Law 17.677 (2003): Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Total: 50 Countries
Regions: 30 Europe, 6 South America, 3 North America, 3 Asia, 6 Africa, 2 Oceania.
Now I ask the reader some basic questions :
Do you think that these countries will ever allow their citizens to speak en masse about Israel's involvement in the JFK assassination, 9/11 and the Epstein files or their role in mass migration in the Western world?
Why does the official narrative require legal enforcement and threaten years of jail time for anybody who comes to a different conclusion than what the machine requires, no, demands.
Everybody loves to say 'history is written by the victors'.
What does that imply?
Everybody loves to say 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'.
What does that imply?
What is the one issue where partisan politicians instinctively take hands and work together?
If you need a hint I'm happy to oblige:
Link to short video on X
So, to appreciate the mountain in the distance :
The narrative needs to collapse because of real transparency causing global awareness.
Putting one person in jail to enforce a narrative is one thing.
How about putting a million people in prison in each country that threatens to do so?
This is the only way change will happen.
Change without violence from people who demand the truth.
As for people of the Abrahamic faiths:
One of these faiths considers Jesus as the biggest subverter in their history and that he is now in Hell or some similar fate, disgraced forever.
One of these faiths have Jesus as their central figure.
One of these faiths consider him to be a great prophet of God Himself.
Two of these faiths are standing in conflict with the third, while logically and based upon historical interactions it should be surprising which two have decided to team up against the other one.
The Book of Revelations were written about things to come before, during or after the 'end days'.
It clearly and specifically states:
Revelations 2:9:
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
And:
Revelations 3:9:
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
How many modern day groups are specifically mentioned like this in a book well known for its cryptic allusion to future events,that are readily identifiable?
It becomes even more important when you realize that this isn't implicating a group as responsible for yet another war.
It is implicating a group working towards Armageddon.
If everybody(I naively assume) is after the facts driven by a need to accurately identify the circumstances that make up our reality, then why is the truth a mountain in the distance that seems impossible to scale?
Would you go to prison for the truth?
Would you sacrifice your life for your country?
Which one would be easier to accept?
I'm so excited.
I've thought long and hard about it, and it stinks to high heaven.
It's impossible to beat the Cabal with force, and it creates monsters out of decent men,reinforcing yet another cycle of manipulation, deception and outright lies. That's the promise violence holds.
Therefore , violence can NEVER be the option.
Exposing the official narrative going back, from before any of us were born, remains the only viable strategy.
There are people throughout history that sounded the alarm, their legacies forever muddied by TPTB who tell you what to think and how to frame it.
They also silence people with legal threats, those who dare to be sceptic about certain historical events.
You can pretty much say what you want about white people, black people, Chinese amongst other asian nations, you can make jokes about the Vietnamese and deny the slaughter that took place by American soldiers. Hell, you can openly hate all Arabs and judge them as in "more than a billion Muslims against a tiny nation, women and children in Gaza are also terrorists and deserved to be wiped out...
... then there's this one anomaly.
Picture a people that have been kicked out of most countries they inserted themselves in.
Picture a world where to criticize them is the one no-no politicians that are polar opposites of each other find a common cause.
As per Grok, who I had to asked numerous times to compile a complete list of countries where legal action could be taken against you for questioning the holocaust narrative(it started out as 19):
I’ve been tasked with updating the list of all countries with laws capable of punishing vocal Holocaust denial, with a specific focus on identifying additional countries in Asia and Africa, as of February 28, 2025. This requires a thorough search beyond my previous list of 42 countries, examining legal frameworks in these regions where such laws are less common due to historical, cultural, and legal differences. I’ll assess explicit Holocaust denial laws, as well as broader statutes (e.g., genocide denial, hate speech) that could reasonably apply, ensuring the list is comprehensive and grounded in current data.
Search for Asia and Africa
Asia: Most Asian countries lack specific Holocaust denial laws due to limited direct historical connection to the Holocaust and stronger emphasis on free speech or other regional priorities. However, some have hate speech or genocide denial laws influenced by international norms or local Jewish communities.
Africa: Similarly, Africa has few explicit laws, as the Holocaust wasn’t a local event, and legal systems often prioritize postcolonial or ethnic conflict issues. Broad anti-racism or hate speech laws may apply in some cases, especially in countries with international alignment or Jewish populations.
Asia Findings
India - The Information Technology Act, 2000 (amended 2008), Section 69A, allows blocking content that incites hatred or threatens public order. Holocaust denial could be restricted if it targets Jewish communities online, with penalties under Section 295A of the Penal Code (up to 3 years) for outraging religious feelings. No explicit Holocaust law, but applicable in context.
Japan - The Act on Punishment of Involvement in Hate Speech (2016) bans hate speech against ethnic groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could be prosecuted if it incites discrimination (fines or injunctions), though no specific cases exist.
South Korea - The National Conference for Unification Act and Criminal Code Article 310 allow punishment of hate speech or historical distortions if they harm public peace. Holocaust denial targeting Jews could qualify (up to 7 years), influenced by South Korea’s Holocaust education efforts.
Africa Findings
Rwanda - Law No. 84/2013 on Genocide Ideology and Related Crimes bans denial of any genocide, including the Holocaust, to prevent revisionism post-1994 genocide (up to 10 years). Explicitly covers Holocaust denial due to international legal alignment.
Kenya - The National Cohesion and Integration Act (2008), Section 13, bans hate speech promoting discrimination or hostility against ethnic or religious groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could be prosecuted if it incites hatred (up to 5 years or fines).
Namibia - The Racial Discrimination Prohibition Act (1991) bans incitement to racial hatred. As a former German colony aware of Nazi history, Holocaust denial could be actionable if it targets Jews (up to 5 years).
Other Regions (Missed Previously)
Estonia - Penal Code Article 151 bans public incitement to hatred or denial of genocide, including the Holocaust (up to 3 years). EU influence and Nazi occupation history make it applicable.
Ireland - Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act (1989) bans speech inciting hatred against religious or ethnic groups, including Jews. Holocaust denial could qualify (up to 2 years), despite Ireland’s free speech leanings.
Updated Comprehensive List
Here’s the full list, now 50 countries, integrating the 42 prior entries with 6 new ones from Asia and Africa, plus 2 from Europe:
Argentina - Law 23.592 (1988), amended 2002: Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial targeting Jews (up to 3 years).
Australia - Section 18C, Racial Discrimination Act 1975: Punishes Holocaust denial as racial vilification (civil penalties, jail for contempt).
Austria - Section 3g, Prohibition Act: Explicitly bans Holocaust denial (up to 10 years).
Belgium - 1995 Holocaust Denial Law: Bans public denial (up to 1 year).
Bolivia - Law No. 045 (2010), Article 16: Bans racism incitement, including Holocaust denial if it targets Jews (up to 5 years).
Bosnia and Herzegovina - Article 145a, Criminal Code (2021): Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (6 months to 5 years).
Brazil - Law 7.716 (1989), amended 2019: Bans racism, including Holocaust denial tied to Nazi ideology (up to 5 years).
Bulgaria - Article 419a, Criminal Code: Bans denial of crimes against humanity, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Canada - Section 319, Criminal Code (2022): Bans antisemitic hate, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Chile - Law 20.609 (2012), Article 31: Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial if antisemitic (up to 3 years).
Colombia - Law 1482 (2011), Article 134A: Bans genocide denial inciting discrimination, including Holocaust (up to 36 months).
Croatia - Article 325, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 3 years).
Cyprus - Law 134(I)/2011: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 5 years).
Czech Republic - Section 261, Criminal Code: Bans Nazi genocide denial, including Holocaust (6 months to 3 years).
Estonia - Penal Code Article 151: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Finland - Chapter 11, Section 10, Criminal Code: Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial targeting Jews (up to 2 years).
France - Gayssot Act (1990): Bans denial of Nuremberg crimes, including Holocaust (up to 1 year or fines).
Germany - Section 130(3), Penal Code: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Greece - Law 927/1979 (2014): Bans Holocaust denial if it incites hatred (up to 3 years).
Hungary - Article 269/C, Criminal Code: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
India - Section 295A, Penal Code & IT Act Section 69A: Bans religious outrage or hate incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Ireland - Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act (1989): Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Israel - Denial of Holocaust (Prohibition) Law (1986): Bans public denial (up to 5 years).
Italy - Law 205/1993 (2016): Bans Holocaust denial (up to 6 years).
Japan - Hate Speech Act (2016): Bans ethnic hate, including Holocaust denial if it incites discrimination (fines or injunctions).
Kenya - National Cohesion Act (2008), Section 13: Bans hate speech, including Holocaust denial if it incites hatred (up to 5 years).
Latvia - Section 74.1, Criminal Law: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Liechtenstein - Article 283, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 2 years).
Lithuania - Article 170(2), Criminal Code: Bans denial of international crimes, including Holocaust (up to 2 years).
Luxembourg - Article 457-3, Penal Code: Bans Holocaust denial (8 days to 6 months or fines).
Malta - Article 82A, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it promotes hatred (up to 18 months).
Namibia - Racial Discrimination Prohibition Act (1991): Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 5 years).
Netherlands - Articles 137c/d, Penal Code: Bans Holocaust denial as defamation or incitement (up to 2 years).
New Zealand - Human Rights Act 1993, Section 61: Bans racial hatred, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years or fines).
Poland - Article 55, Institute of National Remembrance Act: Bans Nazi crime denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Portugal - Article 240, Penal Code: Bans denial of crimes against humanity, including Holocaust (up to 4 years).
Romania - Ordinance No. 31/2002 (2015): Bans public Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Russia - Article 354.1, Criminal Code (2014): Bans Nuremberg fact denial, including Holocaust (up to 5 years).
Rwanda - Law No. 84/2013: Bans all genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 10 years).
Slovakia - Section 422d, Criminal Code: Bans Holocaust denial (up to 3 years).
Slovenia - Article 297, Criminal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 2 years).
South Africa - Equality Act (2000), Section 10: Bans hate speech, including Holocaust denial (civil penalties, jail for contempt).
South Korea - Criminal Code Article 310: Bans hate speech disrupting peace, including Holocaust denial (up to 7 years).
Spain - Article 510, Penal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust, if it incites hatred (up to 4 years).
Sweden - Chapter 16, Section 8, Penal Code: Bans contempt for groups, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Switzerland - Article 261bis, Penal Code: Bans genocide denial, including Holocaust (up to 3 years).
Ukraine - Article 161, Criminal Code (2021): Bans Holocaust denial as antisemitism (up to 5 years).
United Kingdom - Public Order Act 1986 (Sections 18-23): Bans racial hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 7 years).
United States - State laws (e.g., NJ N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4) punish Holocaust denial if it incites violence (up to 18 months).
Uruguay - Law 17.677 (2003): Bans hatred incitement, including Holocaust denial (up to 2 years).
Total: 50 Countries
Regions: 30 Europe, 6 South America, 3 North America, 3 Asia, 6 Africa, 2 Oceania.
Now I ask the reader some basic questions :
Do you think that these countries will ever allow their citizens to speak en masse about Israel's involvement in the JFK assassination, 9/11 and the Epstein files or their role in mass migration in the Western world?
Why does the official narrative require legal enforcement and threaten years of jail time for anybody who comes to a different conclusion than what the machine requires, no, demands.
Everybody loves to say 'history is written by the victors'.
What does that imply?
Everybody loves to say 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'.
What does that imply?
What is the one issue where partisan politicians instinctively take hands and work together?
If you need a hint I'm happy to oblige:
Link to short video on X
So, to appreciate the mountain in the distance :
The narrative needs to collapse because of real transparency causing global awareness.
Putting one person in jail to enforce a narrative is one thing.
How about putting a million people in prison in each country that threatens to do so?
This is the only way change will happen.
Change without violence from people who demand the truth.
As for people of the Abrahamic faiths:
One of these faiths considers Jesus as the biggest subverter in their history and that he is now in Hell or some similar fate, disgraced forever.
One of these faiths have Jesus as their central figure.
One of these faiths consider him to be a great prophet of God Himself.
Two of these faiths are standing in conflict with the third, while logically and based upon historical interactions it should be surprising which two have decided to team up against the other one.
The Book of Revelations were written about things to come before, during or after the 'end days'.
It clearly and specifically states:
Revelations 2:9:
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
And:
Revelations 3:9:
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
How many modern day groups are specifically mentioned like this in a book well known for its cryptic allusion to future events,that are readily identifiable?
It becomes even more important when you realize that this isn't implicating a group as responsible for yet another war.
It is implicating a group working towards Armageddon.
If everybody(I naively assume) is after the facts driven by a need to accurately identify the circumstances that make up our reality, then why is the truth a mountain in the distance that seems impossible to scale?
Would you go to prison for the truth?
Would you sacrifice your life for your country?
Which one would be easier to accept?
