11-15-2024, 02:03 PM
The Onion, that is.
So this was from yesterday:
https://apnews.com/article/onion-buys-in...937b3588e9
The Onion bought InfoWars in an auction to benefit the Sandy Hook victims in getting their $1.5 Billion settlement from Alex Jones, who in my opinion, was just exercising his 1st amendment right.
Now there is this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...bankruptcy
It seems the sale did NOT go to the highest bidder. The rules were changed at the last minute.
This is theft, plain and simple.
If this sale was about paying the victims, the highest bidder (which was not the onion), would have won the auction.
The Guardian does not contain the judge's statement, which was said during the hearing, and i paraphrase, his 'orders were not followed, this was a sale-not an auction'
I laughed at the falsd flag comments he made, but now I am starting to think....
So this was from yesterday:
https://apnews.com/article/onion-buys-in...937b3588e9
The Onion bought InfoWars in an auction to benefit the Sandy Hook victims in getting their $1.5 Billion settlement from Alex Jones, who in my opinion, was just exercising his 1st amendment right.
Now there is this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...bankruptcy
It seems the sale did NOT go to the highest bidder. The rules were changed at the last minute.
This is theft, plain and simple.
If this sale was about paying the victims, the highest bidder (which was not the onion), would have won the auction.
The Guardian does not contain the judge's statement, which was said during the hearing, and i paraphrase, his 'orders were not followed, this was a sale-not an auction'
I laughed at the falsd flag comments he made, but now I am starting to think....
